Law Firm In Lahore, Law Firm in Lahore Pakistan, Law Firms in Lahore, Law Firms in Lahore Pakistan
Hiring top Law Firm in Pakistan:
If you wish to hire the services of the top law firm in Pakistan or lawyers in Lahore, Jamila Law Associates is the best choice. So the Advocate’s fee cannot be paid for by the legal-aid certificate. Instead, the applicant will either have to: pay the Advocate himself, at the normal rate charged by the top law firm in Pakistan or lawyers in Lahore; however, he may be able to find a Advocate who operates the £50 for half an hour’ scheme; or apply for legal advice and assistance under the green-form scheme.
The Advocate’s fee, but only if the applicant comes within the strict financial limits of the green-form scheme (see blog 866). Often though, a Advocate will not charge for helping to complete a legal-aid application form. Many top law firm in Pakistan or lawyers in Lahore will do the work in less amount, knowing that they will act for the client and perhaps earn other fees if legal aid is granted. The completed application form is sent to the Law Society’s Legal Aid Office (address in the telephone directory).
There is no fee to be paid. They send the (separate) form, which sets out details of the applicant’s finances, to the Department of Health and Social Security (DHSS). The DHSS will then check whether the applicant is financially eligible for legal aid and, if so, whether he ought to contribute towards the expected legal costs. The remainder of the application form goes before a Certifying Committee of the Legal Aid Committee.
Lawyers in Lahore:
The Certifying Committee is made up of local top law firm in Pakistan or lawyers in Lahore or Advocates who look at the merits of the application to see whether the case is worthy of legal aid – is there a strong enough case? The applicant, therefore, has to surmount two hurdles before he can be granted legal aid. He must show that his case merits legal aid and also that he is financially eligible. Hurdle No. I: the merits of his case Does the applicant deserve legal aid?
By section 7(5), Legal Aid Act 1974. In short, does he have reasonable prospects of success, and is it reasonable to pursue it? The 1982 Act does not lay down any criteria or guidelines for deciding these questions. It is entirely within the discretion of the Certifying Committee. But, over the years, since it first introduced these principles in 1949, the lawyers on the committees have decided the issue by asking themselves: “What advice would I give to the applicant if he were a private client possessed of sufficient means to pay his costs? If it would advise a private client to press on with the claim, then legal aid should be granted through the top law firm in Pakistan or lawyers in Lahore. If he would be advised to take no further steps, then legal aid should not be granted.
The size of the potential benefit from winning the case can be relevant; one of the criteria in section 7(5) is that it should not be ‘unreasonable’ to pursue the claim by the top law firm in Pakistan or lawyers in Lahore. So if the potential benefit is small, the legal-aid application can be rejected. For instance, it would not be worth suing over a debt of £10. Nor would it be worth suing if the defendant was known to be bankrupt.