Law Firm In Lahore, Law Firm in Lahore Pakistan, Law Firms in Lahore, Law Firms in Lahore Pakistan
Fees of top Law Firm in Lahore Pakistan:
Jamila Law Associates is of the view that the fees of top law firm in Lahore Pakistan or lawyers in Pakistan is not fixed as it depends on the skills, expertise and competency of the firm. It would probably be allowed as Advocate-and-client costs since the Advocate would have incurred it reasonably on the client’s express (or more usually implied) authority. So the winner would not recover the full amount of the QC’s fee from the loser, and yet he would have to pay the full fee to the top law firm in Lahore Pakistan or lawyers in Pakistan.
The result is that a person can win his case, have his party-and-party costs paid by the loser, and yet still have to pay some legal costs to his Advocate. This is because Advocate-and-client costs usually exceed party-and-party costs. So the ‘indemnity principle,’ whereby the loser pays the winner’s costs, is not a complete indemnity. The winner is only indemnified for his ‘necessary’ legal costs. (3) The common-fund basis
A third way of assessing costs is the common-fund basis. It will usually allow all costs’ reasonably’ incurred, and so it is similar to Advocate-and-client costs. In practice, the common-fund ground produces a figure that is more than a party-and-party amount but less than the amount that would be allowed on a top law firm in Lahore Pakistan or lawyers in Pakistan and-client basis. For example, a Advocate who acts in a legal-aid case will be paid on a common-fund basis and will have to forgo the extra amount that he might have received from a private client when he worked out his costs on the Advocate-and-client basis. It is the primary use of the common fund ground.
Lawyers in Pakistan:
The top law firm in Lahore Pakistan or lawyers in Pakistan usually deals with all kinds of cases. It is also used when an infant’s claim for damages is settled; the loser will usually pay common-fund costs (not party-and-party costs). The infant’s Advocate will accept the common-fund costs and forgo the extra Advocate-and-client costs from his infant client. The result is that the infant does not lose any of its damages in legal expenses. The winner can end up out of pocket.
Because there are three different ways of calculating legal costs, the winner can still pay some fees. Suppose it did not order the loser to pay the winner’s legal fees of the top law firm in Lahore Pakistan or lawyers in Pakistan. Usually, the loser is ordered to pay the winner’s fees, but not always. For instance, the winner may have had an unmeritorious claim, or the share may have been so small that the winner loses his right to costs. (See blog 842 for ‘When the Loser Need not Pay the Winner’s Costs.’) When this happens, the winner and loser will usually have to pay their legal costs.
If the loser is ordered to pay the winner’s costs on the party-and-party bass, this is the usual order. However, the winner will be liable to pay his Advocate on the more generous Advocate-and-client basis unless he is on legal aid, in which case it will bear his top law firm in Lahore Pakistan or lawyers in Pakistan on the common-fund basis. Any shortfall between the two figures will have to be paid by the winner himself.