There is plenty of finger pointing when it comes to renewable energy and its prices in the marketplace, but renewable energy proponents argue that it is unfair to single out renewable energy for the problems it causes. Instead, they say, it is much better to look at the larger picture of cheaper electricity, better air quality, and cleaner water supplies. Opponents of renewable energy often point out that once a technology like solar or wind power is installed, electricity rates do not rise for the next ten years or more. However, these opponents admit that renewable energy can sometimes create new economic opportunities in communities where the existing power plants are located. These same opponents also admit that without the installation of these technologies, electricity rates could soar in the future, particularly if fossil fuel sources are no longer available.
Greenhouse Gasses
When it comes to choosing between renewable energy and fossil fuels, there are a number of factors to consider. One of those factors is the impact of greenhouse gases on global warming. Those who support renewable energy often cite the fact that solar energy produces carbon dioxide, while fossil fuels release carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases into the atmosphere. Those who oppose it often cite the fact that power plants have contributed to climate change because of the amount of power they release into the atmosphere. Those who agree with renewable energy often point to wind power as the answer to both of these problems.
By switching to renewable energy, some power plants will be able to continue burning fossil fuels. At the same time, by creating alternative sources of power, people will be less likely to rely on fossil fuels, which will reduce pollution and save the environment. According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, a combination of clean energy and alternative energy will provide most of the reductions needed to meet the EPA’s long-term pollution reduction goal. Even with the Clean Power Plan, however, there are still plenty of fossil fuels being burned for power generation.
Because of the rising cost of energy and the concerns over climate change, there is increasing public pressure to get the electricity rates in the U.S. lower. One way that states and providers can help reduce rates is by developing a renewable energy plan. The proposal would let customers choose between new generation biofuels or traditional plants that burn coal or other nonrenewable resources.
In an effort to encourage competition, a group of states are trying to develop their own renewable energy plans. They are asking their electricity company to allow customers in their area to have the choice of either biofuels or traditional plants. According to a story published by the San Francisco Business Journal, California Attorney General Kamala Harris is expected to file a lawsuit against the nation’s largest electricity company next week. If approved, the state’s plans will allow a consumer in California to have the choice between two different plans. If the electricity company goes along with the plan, it could lead to new business for the company in California, according to the Business Journal. In the same report, The New York Times noted that several state governments are encouraging businesses to develop renewable energy plans.
The Power to Chose
The states are trying to encourage utility companies to offer more affordable rates to consumers who want to use renewable energy. The point is to give the consumers an electricity choice, and empower them to make renewable energy choices it they prefer. The way that they are doing this is by offering “pay for switch” plans. These plans would let customers pay a one-time fee for installation and for electricity whenever they decide to switch over to using alternative energy sources. In addition, many states are trying to get utility companies to make some incentives for customers who are willing to use renewable energy. For example, if a customer buys a certain amount of energy from a renewable energy source, then the state will give the customer money.
According to the San Francisco Business Journal, California Attorney General Harris is expected to file a lawsuit next week against the nation’s largest electricity provider, the electric company owned by Entergy, Inc. According to the Journal, the state will seek compensation for losses suffered because Entergy has refused to make solar panels available to low-income families in the state. However, the company said that it will still be able to provide power to its customers despite the state’s action. Entergy said that the company has already implemented measures to make solar power more accessible to low-income families in California. The company also said that it is working to develop a new alternative power source called Green Power, which it hopes will become more popular than its former venture, nuclear energy.According to the Texas newspaper, the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality is currently examining whether the state’s renewable energy standards for electricity use are being met by electric companies in the state. The paper also reported that the Texas electricity board is considering increasing the rate that renewable fees will be collected from electricity suppliers. In addition, the board is considering increasing the level of residential renewable power capacity that can be used in the state.