The first and foremost question that arises when you visit the zoo is why do animals attract travelers? This is a complicated question, as the exhibits and animal temperament can influence visitors’ perceptions of Zoo animals. Here are a few factors that contribute to visitors’ perceptions of zoo animals. Like Tripster.com exhibit design, animal temperament, and the overall zoo environment can all influence how Zoo visitors perceive animals.
Exhibit design influences visitor perceptions
A study of zoos found that the style of exhibits and interaction between zoo visitors and the animals greatly influence the way they experience the zoo’s animal inhabitants. Public animal training, zoo volunteers, and preconceived notions about animal welfare all influence visitor perceptions. Zoos can use these factors to help promote a positive zoological experience and further conservation goals.
This study explored how exhibit design affects visitor perceptions of the zoo’s animal inhabitants. Visitors were exposed to an eerie environment that made them more likely to take the interpretive materials. The findings provided a more sound theoretical basis for zoo exhibit design and empirical data on what influences visitor reading. It also offered a complete understanding of the factors driving visitor behavior and making exhibits more attractive.
The study also revealed that visitors who describe repetitive behaviors as stereotypical were more negatively influenced by the jaguar’s well-being. However, when compared to visitors who did not visit the zoo, repeat visitors are more likely to support the zoo. A positive connection between visitors and gorillas was also associated with more favorable ratings of the zoo’s exhibits and the animals.
Animal temperament influences animal’s response to visitors
Researchers have studied the effect of the zoo environment on the temperament of animals. For example, a study in Korea demonstrated that different animals have different responses to human visitors. Researchers have also found that animal temperaments may differ from their wild counterparts. The authors of this study cite the work of Gillespie CS and Lindblom E. They note that animal temperaments may vary in zoos and in their homes.
Even though most previous studies have focused on human visitors, this effect is not universal. Studies of the impact of visitors in zoos have not yet been conducted with non-primate taxa. However, it would be helpful if research studies on these animals could be conducted on a more diverse range of species. This research could help determine which zoo visitors affect specific taxa and which ones do not.
The zoo environment influences visitor appreciation for animals
Zoo environments influence visitors’ emotional reactions toward the animals. Visitors report that they experience the greatest positive emotions when observing animals in active behavior. They also report having the greatest positive emotions when they observe animals engaged in activities that are out of sight. Fortunately, zoos have begun to develop more natural exhibit areas. In addition to reintroducing these animals to their natural habitats, these areas also help visitors gain a greater appreciation for the animals.
Similarly, studies have found that zoo environments influence visitors’ conservation knowledge, attitudes, and behavior. Repeat visitors are significantly more likely to retain information on conservation and conduct more conservation-related behaviors than first-timers. The results of this study are summarized in Table 6.
Conservation-oriented visitors influence visitor perceptions
The findings from this study suggest that the perceptions of conservation-oriented Zoo visitors differ from those of generalists. For example, visitors who experience interactions with a staff member during a guided tour tend to be more knowledgeable about the animals. However, when the visitor is confronted with an animal, their knowledge level often decreases. The reason for this discrepancy is unclear, but it may be due to a variety of factors, including the temporal differences between encounter experiences and other experiences.
In addition, there is evidence that high-attendance zoos contribute to greater in-situ conservation projects than those with a lower number of animals. The proportion of threatened species and the zoo’s area is positively correlated with higher zoo attendance, and socio-economic factors play a lesser role. While these findings are encouraging, more research is needed to understand better the role of conservation-oriented visitors and the importance of the zoo.